A California appellate court on Thursday said a cannabis company can pursue three lawsuits challenging the city of Pasadena’s recreational marijuana licensing process as inconsistent and arbitrary, rejecting two rivals’ assertions that the claims seeking to upend their applications are based on protected speech.
The three-judge panel with California’s Second District Court of Appeal affirmed in three unpublished opinions a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge’s decisions keeping alive SweetFlower Pasadena LLC’s three lawsuits, rejecting moves by its rivals Integral Associates Dena LLC and Harvest of Pasadena LLC to strike claims that their applications were invalid under the city’s own rules…
To Read The Rest Of This Article By Lauren Berg on Law360
Published: May 20, 2022
Founder & Interim Editor of L.A. Cannabis News
SHARE
English
Spanish
